Venue: Council Chamber, Rushcliffe Arena, Rugby Road, West Bridgford. View directions
Contact: Helen Tambini 0115 9148320
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: There were no declarations of interest made. |
|
Minutes of the Meeting held on 13 December 2022 PDF 240 KB Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday, 13 December 2022, were declared a true record and signed by the Chairman. |
|
Citizens' Questions To answer questions submitted by citizens on the Council or its services. Minutes: There were no citizens’ questions. |
|
Opposition Group Leaders' Questions To answer questions submitted by Opposition Group Leaders on items on the agenda. Minutes: There were no Opposition Group Leaders’ questions. |
|
2023/24 Budget and Financial Strategy PDF 264 KB The report of the Director – Finance and Corporate Services is attached. Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: The Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Finance and Customer Access, Councillor Moore, presented the report of the Director – Finance and Corporate Services outlining the Council’s proposed budget for 2023/24, the five-year Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) from 2023/24 to 2027/28, which included the revenue budget, the proposed Capital Programme, the Transformation Strategy and the Capital and Investment Strategy. |
|
Infrastructure Funding Statement PDF 250 KB The report of the Director – Development and Economic Growth is attached. Additional documents: Decision: It was RESOLVED that the content of the 2021/22 Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement be acknowledged. Minutes: The Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Planning and Housing, Councillor Upton, presented the report of the Director – Development and Economic Growth detailing the Council’s Infrastructure Funding Statement (IFS).
Councillor Upton confirmed that it was a legal requirement to publish an annual IFS, which detailed the funds collected by the Council from the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 Agreements (s106). The statement detailed funds collected up until 31 March 2022, when approximately £36m was held for s106 funding and £1.6m for CIL. Councillor Upton stated that although this was a considerable sum for s106, it should be noted those funds were primarily used for very large infrastructure projects, and as the funding was collected in phases, until it was all received, it could accumulate for a number of years before being spent. In respect of CIL money, Cabinet noted that this was first collected in late 2019, and much of that funding had already been spent.
In seconding the recommendation, Councillor Brennan stated that on occasion questions were raised and implied criticism given that the Council was not spending funds as quickly as it could, and it was pleasing that this statement clearly set out the true position and why some funding accumulated before being spent.
Councillor Robinson was pleased that those significant funds would ultimately be invested across the Borough, whilst acknowledging that it could be frustrating having to accumulate large sums in advance before work was undertaken. Councillor Robinson referred to the many schemes that had been funded by s106 money over the past 10 years and agreed that this statement answered many of the questions raised about the process. It was also noted that the majority of s106 funding was spent on infrastructure projects not within the Council’s control.
It was RESOLVED that the content of the 2021/22 Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement be acknowledged. |
|
Corporate Enforcement Policy Review PDF 155 KB The report of the Monitoring Officer is attached. Additional documents:
Decision: It was RESOLVED that the proposed amendments to the Corporate Enforcement Policy be endorsed. Minutes: The Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Safety, Councillor Inglis, presented the report of the Monitoring Officer outlining the review of the Council’s Corporate Enforcement Policy.
Councillor Inglis confirmed that the Policy had last been reviewed in October 2019, and had been pleased to see that it had been included in the Work Programme for the Communities Scrutiny Group for review, to ensure that it accurately reflected the approach taken to enforcement corporately, linked with the Council’s enforcement protocols and policies, and to abide with any new legislation, especially following on from the Council’s recent, positive staff restructuring to address enforcement more expediently and robustly. Cabinet noted that the Policy was an umbrella policy, which applied to legislation enforced or administered by Council officers in five areas, details of which were highlighted in paragraph 4.1 of the report.
Councillor Inglis explained that the revised document incorporated an amendment, requested by the Communities Scrutiny Group in regard to proportionality and that the first stages would be prevention but would then follow the concept of the widely used four Es protocol: Engage; Explain; Educate; and Enforce. It was noted; however, that any serious incident would be pitched at the appropriate level with consideration to the individual circumstances of that case.
Councillor Inglis concluded by advising that the Policy clearly set out the principles of enforcement and that the primary purpose was to protect the public and the environment, and the Policy also included an Equality Impact Assessment form, which had a clearly written protocol that could be easily understood and conformed to.
In seconding the recommendation, Councillor Edyvean reiterated the importance of reviewing and keeping policies updated, referred to the scourge of enviro-crime in modern living and to the inroads that the Council had made to improve, discourage, and clean up problem areas. Whilst that formed only a small part of the review, Councillor Edyvean advised that it was important that the Council continued to deliver excellent services across all areas.
Councillor Brennan welcomed the report, referred to the importance of investing in resources and staff to ensure the rules and regulations were enforced, and referred to the positive feedback that she had received when the Council had acted swiftly to deal with littering and fly-tipping in particular.
Councillor Moore concurred with previous comments and stated that having a strong enforcement regime was invaluable and people were noticing that action was being taken.
Councillor Robinson referred to the challenges of keeping up with legislative changes, which was demanding for officers, often caused frustration to residents, and it was acknowledged that there were times when the Council would prefer to do more but was unable to do so.
It was RESOLVED that the proposed amendments to the Corporate Enforcement Policy be endorsed. |